Three Minute Digest for February 15, 2022

April 21, 2022

The markets continue to be concerned about rising US consumer costs and escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine. Our thoughts lean towards Vladimir Putin playing high stakes hardball to position himself on a number of geopolitical issues with the West. There is a crippling economic downside for Russia from an invasion although China is more than willing to step in and fill the void if needed.

A decline in COVID-19 cases across the US prompted officials to relax some restrictions.

Three Thoughts for the Markets

Russia /Ukraine

Crude oil is approaching $95 per barrel and the psychological impact should it surge to $100 could be significant for the markets and our economy.

We are at point of maximum uncertainty for the Russia / Ukraine crisis. Vladimir Putin may sense weakness in the NATO / Western allies’ options to respond and at 70 years of age, he may see this as his best opportunity to cement his legacy of Russian dominance over the former USSR satellite nations. The main stated goal of deterring Ukraine from joining NATO has perhaps already been met although Putin is looking for a permanent declaration from NATO preventing Ukrainian membership.

The Nord Stream II pipeline is a key bargaining chip in this dispute. It is a new 745-mile gas pipeline running from western Russia to north-eastern Germany under the Baltic Sea. It follows the exact same route as Nord Stream 1 which was completed in 2012. It is designed to double the amount of natural gas flowing from Russia straight to Germany. Its owner is the Russian state-controlled gas firm Gazprom.

Inflation / Interest Rates

The consensus on Wall Street sees the Federal Reserve raising interest rates as many as seven times this year. Historically, rate changes are at 0.25% intervals. It is possible the March meeting may see a 0.50% hike and the market reaction to that is certainly to be determined.

The Federal Reserve or “Fed” through the FOMC, Federal Open Markets Committee set the Federal Funds Rate. This is the interest rate that banks charge each other to borrow or lend excess reserves overnight. Banks are required to maintain a certain ration of funds relative to their daily deposits. If a bank is under this level on any day, they borrow money from each to meet the required levels.

While it may not seem like an overnight interest rate between banks would affect each of us – this rate is an important benchmark for most other interest rates in our economy.

Canadian Truckers Protest

The protest began with the introduction of a new rule that all truckers must be vaccinated to cross the US-Canada border, but the protests have morphed into broader challenges to Covid health restrictions and the Canadian government in general. Truckers have gridlocked the area around their Parliament in the Canadian Capital of Ottawa.

The Canadian protest could move south and further impact supply chains, adding tension to an already nervous market.

January 28, 2026
The Federal Reserve concluded its meeting today by leaving interest rates unchanged, maintaining the current policy range as it continues to assess the evolving economic landscape. This decision reflects a deliberate pause after recent policy adjustments and underscores the Fed’s ongoing effort to balance progress on inflation with signs of moderation in economic growth. In its statement, the Federal Open Market Committee acknowledged that inflation has continued to ease from prior peaks, though it remains above the Fed’s longer-term objective. At the same time, economic activity has shown resilience. Consumer spending has held up, business investment remains uneven but stable, and labor market conditions, while cooling from earlier strength, continue to reflect solid underlying demand for workers. Wage growth has moderated, but employment levels remain elevated relative to historical norms. The Fed’s decision to hold rates steady signals a desire for greater clarity before making additional policy moves. Policymakers have emphasized that future decisions will be driven by incoming data rather than a predetermined path. This approach reflects the complexity of the current environment, where encouraging inflation trends coexist with pockets of economic strength that could slow further progress if policy is eased too quickly. For the broader economy, a steady policy stance provides near-term predictability. Borrowing costs remain elevated compared to the prior decade, but the absence of additional tightening reduces the risk of an abrupt slowdown. Households and businesses continue to adapt to higher rates, and the Fed appears focused on avoiding unnecessary pressure that could undermine growth while inflation is already moving in the right direction. From a market perspective, today’s decision reinforces a theme investors have been grappling with for months: patience. Markets have spent much of the past year adjusting expectations around the timing and pace of potential rate cuts. The Fed’s message suggests that while easing may occur in the future, it is unlikely to happen rapidly or without clear evidence that inflation is sustainably under control. As a result, market movements are likely to remain sensitive to economic data, particularly inflation reports, employment figures, and indicators of consumer demand. Importantly, the Fed also reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining restrictive policy until it is confident that price stability has been restored. This reinforces the idea that the central bank is prioritizing long-term economic health over short-term market comfort. While this stance can introduce periods of volatility, it also supports the foundation for more durable growth over time. Looking ahead, the economic outlook remains constructive but uneven. Growth is expected to continue at a more moderate pace, with cooling inflation and stable employment supporting consumer activity. At the same time, higher financing costs and tighter credit conditions may weigh on certain sectors, particularly those that benefited from ultra-low rates in prior years. This divergence underscores the importance of diversification and discipline within investment strategies. At Affinity Capital, we view today’s decision as consistent with a broader transition toward a more normalized economic environment. The era of emergency-level policy is firmly behind us, and the path forward is likely to involve incremental adjustments rather than dramatic shifts. Periods like this often reward investors who remain focused on long-term objectives, risk management, and thoughtful portfolio construction rather than short-term headlines. As always, we will continue to monitor economic developments closely and assess how changes in monetary policy may impact portfolios and financial plans. While uncertainty remains a constant in markets, a measured and intentional approach continues to be the most reliable way to navigate it.
January 21, 2026
Recent market headlines have been driven less by economic data and more by geopolitics. In particular, renewed discussion around Greenland and its strategic importance has introduced a new layer of uncertainty into global markets. Greenland matters not because of its size or population, but because of its location and resources. It sits at a critical crossroads between North America and Europe, plays an increasingly important role in Arctic shipping routes, and holds significant reserves of rare earth minerals that are essential for technology, defense systems, and energy infrastructure. As global competition for these resources intensifies, Greenland has become a focal point in broader strategic and trade discussions. Markets reacted quickly to this uncertainty. U.S. stock indexes moved lower in a broad selloff, with technology shares leading the decline. At the same time, investors shifted toward more defensive assets, pushing volatility higher, lifting gold prices, and pressuring risk-oriented assets such as cryptocurrencies. Similar caution was reflected in overseas markets as well. When geopolitical issues intersect with trade policy, markets tend to respond swiftly. Even the possibility of changes in tariffs, trade relationships, or diplomatic alignment can influence assumptions about global supply chains, corporate earnings, and economic growth. That is what markets have been digesting. These developments are now a regular part of the global environment. Markets today must absorb not only interest rates and earnings reports, but also geopolitical strategy, resource security, and shifting alliances. This can create short-term market adjustments as investors reassess expectations. Geopolitical uncertainty does not automatically translate into lasting economic damage. Markets have navigated trade disputes, diplomatic standoffs, and strategic realignments many times before. Over time, clarity emerges, negotiations evolve, and economic activity adapts. We continue to watch these developments closely and view them as part of the broader global backdrop in which markets operate. While the headlines may feel new, the underlying dynamic of markets responding to geopolitical uncertainty is familiar and expected. If you have questions about how global events fit into the bigger picture, we are always available to talk them through. Understanding the context behind the headlines is often the most effective way to stay grounded when markets react to evolving global issues.
December 11, 2025
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.