The Order of Returns

The first four months of 2026 have been a useful reminder that markets do not move in straight lines. After entering the year at record highs, U.S. equities pulled back sharply on geopolitical tensions tied to the Iran conflict, with the S&P 500 coming close to a ten percent decline before recovering much of that ground. Volatility has returned again on rising energy prices and a softer tone from the technology sector that has carried so much of this cycle’s leadership. Oil sits near one hundred dollars per barrel, the ten-year Treasury yield hovers near four and a half percent, and traditional diversification between stocks and bonds has been less reliable than many investors have come to expect.
None of this changes our long-term view. It does sharpen a conversation we believe every household within ten years of retirement, on either side of that line, should be having right now.
THE QUESTION THAT MATTERS MOST
After more than thirty years of advising families through every kind of market, I have come to believe that one question matters more than almost any other in retirement planning. It is not what your average return will be. It is not even how much you have saved. The question is this: in what order will those returns arrive, and what will the portfolio be doing when they do?
Two households can finish their working years with identical balances and identical long-term average returns. One can run out of money. One can remain wealthy for life. The only difference between them is the order in which good and bad years happened to fall.
WHY ORDER MATTERS MORE THAN AVERAGE
When a portfolio is accumulating, a market drop is something close to a gift. Contributions buy more shares at lower prices. When a portfolio is distributing, the same drop is a wound. Every dollar withdrawn during a downturn cannot participate in the recovery, and the base from which all future growth compounds is permanently smaller. Retirees who began withdrawals in 1973, in 2000, or in 2008 lived through outcomes quite different from those who retired even two or three years earlier or later. Same averages over the long arc. Very different lives for the family.
THE RETIREMENT RED ZONE
Retirement planning does not begin the year you stop working. It begins five to ten years before. We sometimes call that window the retirement red zone, and it is the period in which the wrong portfolio, held too long, can do real and lasting damage. A portfolio that served someone beautifully through their fifties is rarely the right portfolio for the first decade of withdrawals. Waiting until the retirement date itself to reposition is not a plan. It is a hope.
HOW WE REPOSITION PORTFOLIOS
Repositioning is a multi-year process, not a single trade. We model honest cash-flow needs in dollars. We construct one to three years of withdrawals in stable, liquid reserves so no client is ever forced to sell equities into a falling market. We build an intermediate layer of high-quality bonds to refill those reserves over time. We sequence withdrawals across taxable, traditional, and Roth accounts to manage lifetime tax cost, often using the years before Social Security and required minimum distributions for thoughtful Roth conversions. We rightsized concentrated and legacy positions over multiple tax years. And we stress test the plan against a meaningful market drop in year one before any client crosses the retirement line.
A CLOSING THOUGHT
Sequence risk is not really a math problem. It is a human one. The discipline to reposition during good markets, when it can feel almost unnecessary, is what separates retirees who sleep well from those who reach for the wrong decision at the worst possible moment. By the time a dramatic market drop arrives, the work either has been done or it has not.
Whether you are a long-time client of Affinity Capital or considering a relationship with our firm, we would welcome a conversation about how your portfolio is positioned for the years ahead.




